|
|
|
*Lost somewhere between
immensity and eternity is our tiny planetary home.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter I, "The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean"
|
|
|
*The surface of the Earth
is the shore of the cosmic ocean. From it we have learned most of what we
know. Recently, we have waded a little out to sea, enough to dampen our
toes or, at most, wet our ankles. The water seems inviting. The ocean
calls.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter I, "The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean"
(cf. ISLANDS)
|
|
|
*There are some hundred
billion (1011) galaxies, each with, on the average a hundred
billion stars. In all the galaxies, there are perhaps as many planets as
stars,
1011 X 1011 = 1022, ten billion trillion.
In the face of such overpowering numbers, what is the likelihood that only
one ordinary star, the Sun, is accompanied by an inhabited planet? Why
should we, tucked away in some forgotten corner of the Cosmos, be so
fortunate?
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter I, "The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean"
|
|
|
*On some [planets],
intelligent life may have evolved, reworking the planetary surface in some
massive engineering enterprise. These are our brothers and sisters in the
Cosmos. Are they very different from us? What is their form, biochemistry,
neurobiology, history, politics, science, technology, art, music, religion,
philosophy? Perhaps one day we will know them.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter I, "The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean"
|
|
|
*We are like butterflies
who flutter for a day and think it is forever.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter II, "One Voice in the Cosmic Fugue"
|
|
|
*Occasionally someone remarks
on what a lucky coincidence it is that the Earth is perfectly suitable for
life---moderate enough temperatures, liquid water, oxygen atmosphere, and so
on. But this is, at least in part, a confusion of cause and effect. We
earthlings are supremely well adapted to the environment of the Earth because
we grew up here. Those earlier forms of life that were not well adapted
died. We are descended from the organisms that did well. Organisms that
evolve on a quite different world will doubtless sing its praises too.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter II, "One Voice in the Cosmic Fugue"
|
|
|
*The asteroid belt may
be a place where a planet was once prevented from forming because of the
gravitational tides of the giant nearby planet Jupiter; or it may be the
shattered remains of a planet that blew itself up. This seems improbable
because no scientist on Earth knows how a planet might blow itself up,
which is probably just as well.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter IV, "Heaven and Hell"
|
|
|
*We are, almost all of
us, descended from people who responded to the dangers of existence by
inventing stories about unpredictable or disgruntled deities.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter VII, "The Backbone of the Night"
|
|
|
*The scientific world
view works so well, explains so much and resonates so harmoniously with
the most advanced parts of our brains that in time, I think, virtually
every culture on the Earth, left to its own devices, would have
discovered science.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter VII, "The Backbone of the Night"
|
|
|
*We make our world
significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our
answers.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter VII, "The Backbone of the Night"
|
|
|
*Hidden within every
astronomical investigation, sometimes so deeply buried that the researcher
himself is unaware of its presence, lies a kernal of awe.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter IX, "The Lives of the Stars"
|
|
|
*The study of the galaxies
reveals a universal order and beauty. It also shows us chaotic violence on
a scale hitherto undreamed of. That we live in a universe which permits
life is remarkable. That we live in one which destroys galaxies and stars
and worlds is also remarkable. The universe seems neither benign nor
hostile, merely indifferent to the concerns of such puny creatures as we.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter IX, "The Edge of Forever"
|
|
|
*We are, in the most
profound sense, children of the Cosmos.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter IX, "The Lives of the Stars"
|
|
|
*Modern physics and
chemistry have reduced the complexity of the sensible world to an
astonishing simplicity: three units put together in various patterns make,
essentially, everything.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter IX, "The Lives of the Stars"
|
|
|
*The total amount of
energy from outside the solar system ever received by all the radio
telescopes on the planet Earth is less than the energy of a singly snowflake
striking the ground.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter X, "The Edge of Forever"
|
|
|
*If the general picture of
an expanding universe and a Big Bang is correct, we must then confront still
more difficult questions. What were conditions like at the time of the Big
Bang? What happened before that? Was there a tiny universe, devoid of all
matter, and then the matter suddenly created from nothing? How does
that happen? In many cultures it is customary to answer that God
created the universe out of nothing. But this is mere temporizing. If we
wish courageously to pursue the question, we must of course ask next where
God comes from. And if we decide this to be unanswerable, why not save a
step and decide that the origin of the universe is an unanswerable question.
Or, if we say that God has always existed, why not save a step and conclude
that the universe has always existed?
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter X, "The Edge of Forever"
|
|
|
*If there were no books,
no written records, think how prodigious a time twenty-three centuries would
be. With four generations per century, twenty-three centuries occupies
almost a hundred generations of human beings. If information could be
passed on merely by word of mouth, how little we should know of our past,
how slow would be our progress! Everything would depend on what ancient
findings we had accidentally been told about, and how accurate the account
was. Past information might be revered, but in successive retellings it
would become progressively more muddled and eventually lost. Books permit
us to voyage through time, to tap the wisdom of our ancestors. The library
connects us with the insights and knowledge, painfully extracted from Nature,
of the greatest minds that ever were, with the best teachers, drawn from the
entire planet and from all of our history, to instruct us without tiring,
and to inspire us to make our own contribution to the collective knowledge
of the human species. Public libraries depend on voluntary contributions.
I think the health of our civilization, the depth of our awareness about
the underpinnings of our culture and our concern for the future can all
be tested by how well we support our libraries.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XI, "The Persistence of Memory"
(cf. HISTORY : Niane)
|
|
|
*A book is made from a
tree. It is an assemblage of flat, flexible parts (still called "leaves")
imprinted with dark pigmented squiggles. One glance at it and you hear the
voice of another person---perhaps someone dead for thousands of years.
(Across the millenia, the author is speaking, clearly and silently, inside
your head, directly to you.)
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XI, "The Persistence of Memory"
|
|
|
*For the price of a modest
meal you can ponder the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, the origin of
species, the interpretation of dreams, the nature of things.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XI, "The Persistence of Memory"
|
|
|
*Writing is perhaps the
greatest of human inventions, binding together people, citizens of distant
epochs, who never knew one another. Books break the shackles of time.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XI, "The Persistence of Memory"
|
|
|
*Or perhaps they [extra-
terrestrials] are here, but in hiding because of some Lex Galactica,
some ethic of noninterference with emerging civilizations. We can imagine
them, curious and dispassionate, observing us, as we would watch a bacterial
culture in a dish of agar, to determine whether, this year again, we manage
to avoid self-destruction.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XII, "Encyclopaedia Galactica"
|
|
|
*There is no other species
on Earth that does science. It is, so far, entirely a human invention,
evolved by natural selection in the cerebral cortex for one simple reason:
it works.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XIII, "Who Speaks For Earth?"
|
|
|
*An extraterrestrial
visitor, looking at the differences among human beings and their
societies, would find those differences [between "us" humans and "those"
humans] trivial compared to the similarities. The Cosmos may be densely
populated with intelligent beings. But the Darwinian lesson is clear:
There will be no humans elsewhere. Only here. Only on this small planet.
We are a rare as well as an endangered species. Every one of us, in the
cosmic perspective, precious. If a human disagrees with you, let him
live. In a hundred billion galaxies, you will not find another.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XIII, "Who Speaks For Earth?"
|
|
|
*If we survive, our time
will be famous for two reasons: that at this dangerous moment of
technological adolescence we managed to avoid self-destruction; and because
this is the epoch in which we began our journey to the stars.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XIII, "Who Speaks For Earth?"
|
|
|
*The conventional bombs
of World War II were called blockbusters. Filled with twenty tons of TNT,
they could destroy a city block. All the bombs dropped on all the cities
in World War II amounted to some two million tons, two megatons, of TNT---
Coventry and Rotterdam, Dresden and Tokyo, all the death that rained from
the skies between 1939 and 1945: a hundred thousand blockbusters, two
megatons. By the late twentieth century, two megatons was the energy
released in the explosion of a single more or less humdrum thermonuclear
bomb: one bomb with the destructive force of the Second World War. But
there are tens of thousands of nuclear weapons. By the ninth decade of
the twentieth century the strategic missile and bomber forces of the Soviet
Union and the United States were aiming warheads at over 15,000 designated
targets. No place on the planet was safe. The energy contained in these
weapons, genies of death patiently awaiting the rubbing of the lamps, was
far more than 10,000 megatons---but with the destruction concentrated
efficiently, not over six years but over a few hours, a blockbuster for
every family on the planet, a World War II every second for the length of
a lazy afternoon.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XIII, "Who Speaks For Earth?"
|
|
|
*Something in us
recognizes the Cosmos as home. We are made of stellar ash. Our origin
and evolution have been tied to distant cosmic events. The exploration
of the Cosmos is a voyage of self-discovery.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Cosmos, 1980
Chapter XIII, "Who Speaks For Earth?"
|
|
|
*For all
the tenure of humans on Earth, the night sky had been a companion and an
inspiration. The stars were comforting. They seemed to demonstrate that
the heavens were created for the benefit and instruction of humans. This
pathetic conceit became the conventional wisdom worldwide. No culture was
free of it. Some people found in the skies an aperture to the religious
sensibility. Many were awestruck and humbled by the glory and scale of
the cosmos. Others were stimulated to the most extravagant flights of fancy.
At the very moment that humans discovered the scale of
the universe and found that their most unconstrained fancies were in fact
dwarfed by the true dimensions of even the Milky Way Galaxy, they took steps
that ensured that their descendants would be unable to see the stars at all.
For a million years humans had grown up with a personal daily knowledge of
the vault of heaven. In the last few thousand years they began building and
emigrating to the cities. In the last few decades, a major fraction of the
human population had abandoned a rustic way of life. As technology developed
and the cities were polluted, the nights became starless. New generations
grew to maturity wholly ignorant of the sky that had transfixed their
ancestors and that had stimulated the modern age of science and technology.
Which even noticing, just as astronomy entered a golden age most people cut
themselves off from the sky, a cosmic isolationism that ended only with the
dawn of space exploration.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Contact, 1985
Part I : The Message, Chapter 2, "Coherent Light"
|
|
|
*If we like them, they're
freedom fighters . . . If we don't like them, they're terrorists.
In the unlikely case we can't make up our minds, they're temporarily only
guerrillas.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Contact, 1985
Part I : The Message, Ch. 2, "Coherent Light"
|
|
|
*But don't you have the sense
that if they're anywhere, they're everywhere?
|
|
|
-Peter Valerian, a character in Carl Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part I, "The Message", Chapter 2, "Coherent Light"
|
|
|
*Around Santa Fe, the
faintest glimmerings of dawn might be seen above the Sangre de Cristo
Mountains. (Why should a religion, she asked herself, name its places
after the blood and body, heart and pancreas of its most revered figure?
And why not the brain, among other prominent uncommemorated organs?)
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Contact, 1985
Part I : The Message, Ch. 3, "White Noise"
|
|
|
*[Since television programs
were the first Earthly broadcasts to travel through space outside our solar
system, they may be an extraterrestrial civilization's first glimpse of
Earthlings. For instance, the first television message strong enough to reach
into space was Adolf Hitler's opening speech at the 1936 Berlin Olympic
Games.] "Those goddamn programs are our ambassadors into space . . . the
Emissary from Earth." She paused to savor the phrase. "With an ambassador,
you're supposed to put your best foot forward, and we've been sending mainly
crap to space for forty years. I'd like to see the network executives come
to grips with this one. And that madman Hitler, that's the first news they
have about Earth. What are they going to think of us?"
|
|
|
-President Lasker, a character in Carl Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part I, "The Message", Chapter 6, "Palimpsest"
|
|
|
*"Well,
what do you suppose the Message is about?
"I don't see any way to tell, Ms. President. I can only
repeat what Dr. Arroway said. It's an intricate and complex Message. The
transmitting civilization is eager for us to receive it. Maybe all this is
one small volume of the Encyclopaedia Galactica. The star Vega is
about three times more massive than the Sun and about fifty times brighter.
Because it burns its nuclear fuel so fast, it has a much shorter lifetime
than the Sun---"
"Yes. Maybe something's about to go wrong on Vega," the
Director of Central Intelligence interrupted. "Maybe their planet will be
destroyed. Maybe they want someone else to know about their civilization
before they're wiped out."
|
|
|
-President Lasker and Peter Valerian,
characters in Carl Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part I, "The Message", Chapter 6, "Palimpsest"
|
|
|
*Once, during
a vigorous discussion on the relative merits of the two political systems
[communism and democracy], Ellie had boasted that she had been free to
march in front of the White House protesting American involvement in the
Vietnam War. Vaygay [a Russian] replied that in the same period he had
been equally free to march in front of the Kremlin protesting American
involvement in the Vietnam War.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Contact, 1985
Part I : The Message, Chapter 7, "The Ethanol in W-3"
|
|
|
*"Every government that
prepares for war paints its adversaries as monsters," she said. "They
don't want you thinking of the other side as human. If the enemy can think
and feel, you might hesitate to kill them. And killing is very important.
Better to see them as monsters."
|
|
|
-Eleanor Arroway, the hero in Carl Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part I : The Message, Ch. 9, "The Numinous"
|
|
|
*"[W]hy do
people say 'make the same mistake again'? What does 'again' add to the
sentence? And am I right that 'burn up' and 'burn down' mean the same
thing? 'Slow up' and 'slow down' mean the same thing? So if 'screw up' is
acceptable, why not 'screw down'?". . . ."And take this phrase 'head over
heels in love.' " he continued. "This is a common expression, yes? But it's
exactly backward. Or, rather, upside down. You are ordinarily head
over heels. When you are in love you should be heels over head. Am
I right?"
|
|
|
-Vasily Gregorovich Lunarcharsky (Vaygay), a
character in Carl Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part I : The Message, Chapter 9, "The Numinous"
|
|
|
*She came to admire him
so much that his love for her affected her own self-esteem: She liked
herself better because of him.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Contact, 1985
Part I : The Message, Chapter 9, "The Numinous"
|
|
|
*[Rankin is a Christian
evangelist.] Anything you don't understand, Mr. Rankin, you attribute to
God. God for you is where you sweep away all the mysteries of the world, all
the challenges to our intelligence. You simply turn your mind off and say
God did it.
|
|
|
-Eleanor Arroway, the hero in Carl Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part II, "The Machine", Chapter 10, "Procession of the Equinoxes"
|
|
|
*As a philosopher in our
part of the world once said: 'The artifacts of a sufficiently advanced
extraterrestrial civilization would be indistinguishable from magic.'
|
|
|
-Devi Sukhavati, an Indian character in Carl
Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part II, "The Machine", Chapter 11, "The World Message Consortium"
|
|
|
*You know the opinion of
Cervantes? He said that reading a translation is like examining the
back of a piece of tapestry.
|
|
|
-Vasily Gregorovich Lunarcharsky (Vaygay), a
character in Carl Sagan's
Contact, 1985
Part II : The Machine, Ch. 11, "The World Message Consortium"
|
|
|
We are an intelligent species and the use of
our intelligence quite properly gives us pleasure. In this respect the brain
is like a muscle. When we think well, we feel good. Understanding is a
kind of ecstasy.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Can We Know the Universe? Reflections on a Grain of Sand
|
|
|
The more restrictions there are on what matter
and energy can do, the more knowledge human beings can attain.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
Can We Know the Universe? Reflections on a Grain of Sand
|
|
|
At the heart of science is an essential
tension between two seemingly contradictory attitudes--an openness to new
ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive they may be, and the most
ruthless skeptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new. This is how deep
truths are winnowed from deep nonsense. Of course, scientists make
mistakes in trying to understand the world, but there is a built-in error-
correcting mechanism: The collective enterprise of creative thinking and
skeptical thinking together keeps the field on track.
|
|
|
-Carl Sagan
|
|
|